MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 1066: Ultrasound-targeted Plasmid Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Angiopoietin-1: Combination Gene Therapy for Therapeutic Angiogenesis

2008· article· en· W73112114 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandra H. Smith, Michael A. Kuliszewski, Hiroko Fujii, Duncan J. Stewart, Jonathan R. Lindner, Howard Leong‐Poi

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAngiogenesisLigationTherapeutic angiogenesisVascular endothelial growth factorNeovascularizationAngiopoietinMicrobubblesArteriogenesisIschemiaGenetic enhancementGene deliveryVascular endothelial growth factor AInternal medicineUltrasoundEndocrinologyUrologyVEGF receptorsBiologyGeneRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have previously shown that ultrasound-mediated (UM) delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plasmid-bearing microbubbles promotes therapeutic angiogenesis. While VEGF is important during the initiation of angiogenesis, it results in primarily immature vessels, which are prone to late regression. Angiopoietin (Ang)-1 is a potent growth factor that acts to stabilize the neovasculature, later in the angiogenic process. We hypothesized that temporal delivery of VEGF and Ang-1 plasmid DNA would result in a more sustained angiogenic response, as compared to VEGF alone, in the setting of severe chronic ischemia. Methods : Unilateral hindlimb ischemia was produced by iliac artery ligation in 30 rats. At day 14 post-ligation, microvascular blood velocity (β) and flow (MBF) in the proximal hindlimb muscles were assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEU). UM-delivery of plasmid (500 μg cDNA)-bearing microbubbles (1×109), was then performed at pre-specified time points, with treatment groups including VEGF alone at day 14; VEGF at day 14 followed by Ang-1 at day 28; and control rats receiving no therapy (n=10 per group). β and MBF were re-assessed at day 28 and 8 wks post-ligation. Results : Relative MBF (normalized to the contralateral normal leg) remained reduced at all time points after ligation in the control group. In VEGF-alone treated animals, MBF in the ischemic leg increased 2 wks after delivery (0.48 ± 0.19 to 0.82 ± 0.23, p < 0.001), but regressed over the next 4 wks (0.61 ± 0.14 at 8 wk, NS vs. 2 wks). In the VEGF/Ang-1 treated animals, MBF in the ischemic leg also increased 2 weeks after VEGF delivery (0.39 ± 0.19 to 0.69 ± 0.28, p < 0.01); however, vascular regression was prevented by late Ang1 delivery (0.83 ± 0.20 at 8 wks, p < 0.005 vs. 2 wks and p<0.01 vs VEGF alone at 8 wks). At week 8, relative β values were greater in VEGF/Ang-1 treated compared to VEGF-alone treated animals (0.87 ± 0.33 to 0.60 ± 0.23, p < 0.05). Conclusions : Compared to delivery of VEGF alone, delivery of Ang-1 plasmid DNA at 2 wks post-VEGF gene delivery results in sustained improvement in MBF, with prevention of late vascular regression. The greater microvascular blood velocity in VEGF/Ang-1 treated muscle may signify improved vascular functionality with late Ang-1 therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→