afffundBest Practices for Scientific Computing2014· article· en· PLoS Biology· Decision Sciences721citations
affPost-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis2002· review· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences719citations
afffundvenueDevelopment of the Instrument to assess the Credibility of Effect Modification Analyses (ICEMAN) in randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses2020· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Decision Sciences717citations
venueno affIntegration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses2009· review· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Decision Sciences715citations
affInterpretation of formative measurement in information systems research2009· article· en· Journal of the Association for Information Systems· Decision Sciences708citations
affMulti-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and Concepts2023· article· en· Encyclopedia· Decision Sciences708citations
affThe diffusion of Internet banking among Singapore consumers2003· article· en· International Journal of Bank Marketing· Decision Sciences708citations
afffundCONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials2025· article· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences703citations
afffund2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group2015· article· en· Spine· Decision Sciences702citations
affThe role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-Service environments2006· article· en· Interacting with Computers· Decision Sciences698citations
affRandomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review.2005· review· en· PubMed· Decision Sciences696citations
affno abstractIntuition, reason, and metacognition2011· article· en· Cognitive Psychology· Decision Sciences694citations
afffundPreferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist2020· article· en· BMJ· Decision Sciences688citations
affManaging the Unexpected2011· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Decision Sciences688citations
affno abstractAdditive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA2008· article· en· European Journal of Operational Research· Decision Sciences684citations
afffundaboutCONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration2008· editorial· en· PLoS Medicine· Decision Sciences683citations
afffundReliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system2008· article· en· BMC Health Services Research· Decision Sciences677citations
affno abstractLiving systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how2017· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences671citations
affApproaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses2017· editorial· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences664citations
affMethodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews2020· article· en· JBI Evidence Synthesis· Decision Sciences664citations
afffundThe CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development2013· article· en· BMJ Case Reports· Decision Sciences664citations
affno abstractEgocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution2004· book-chapter· en· Social Cognition· Decision Sciences662citations
venueno aff<scp>FinBERT</scp>: A Large Language Model for Extracting Information from Financial Text*2022· article· en· Contemporary Accounting Research· Decision Sciences648citations
affaboutNon‐parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry2001· article· en· American Journal of Agricultural Economics· Decision Sciences643citations
affPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a <scp>PRISMA</scp> extension2021· article· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Decision Sciences641citations