MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

823 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
823 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 17

Labels cover 3 of 823 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 823 of 823 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Victoria, Canada
2019· book-chapter· en· Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Technology and care in Canada
Arlene Astell, Janet Fast
2023· book-chapter· en· Policy Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Shaping the future of care together
Building Britain's future, Care Support Independence
2009· book· en· TSO eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Weidegang in Alberta geen agendapunt
H. Bos
2002· article· nl· Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The Canadian Patient Perspective
Brian T. Rose
2017· article· en· Journal of Recovery in Mental Health· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Taking the strain
Stephen Matthews
2008· article· en· Lloyd's shipping economist· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Declaration of Helsinki at Age 60
Michael Shevell, James L. Bernat
2025· editorial· en· Neurology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/s1541-9800(10)70431-2
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Letter of Transmittal
Leonard Marsh
2018· book-chapter· en· McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The state in ageing Canada
Kathrin Komp, Patrik Marier
2015· book-chapter· en· Policy Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About