MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Military and Defense Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

605 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
605 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 10 of 13

Labels cover 0 of 605 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 605 of 605 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Air Force Contingency Contracting
John A. Ausink, Laura Werber, Mary E. Chenoweth
2011· article· en· JMIR Research Protocols· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Executive Agreements Database, Statement Regarding Amendment Three to the Memorandum of Understanding Between The Department Of Defense of the United States of America and The Department Of National Defence Of Canada Concerning the Exchange Of Defence Professional Personnel Signed At Arlington and Ottawa May 30 and July 15, 2003 Entered Into Force July 15, 2003 Effective October 2, 2003
Oona A. Hathaway, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
2003· dataset· en· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The Prince George Centre of the RASC
G.W. Self
2007· article· en· Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Commander Tom Wemf 2000
2000· other· en· Internet Archive (Internet Archive)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Opening the Mexican Door: Continental Defense Cooperation
Jeffrey W. Burkett
2005· article· en· Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School)· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · sts
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Does Canada Need a Permanent Military Court
David McNairn
2006· article· en· Revue nationale de droit constitutionnel· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canada’s NATO Commitments during the Cold War
Erika Simpson
2001· book-chapter· en· McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+stsconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Executive Agreements Database, Statement Regarding Amendment Number Seven to the Memorandum of Understanding Between The United States, Australia, Canada, The French Republic, The Republic Of Italy, The Kingdom of the Netherlands, The Kingdom Of Norway, The Kingdom Of Spain and The United Kingdom Of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Concerning A Cooperative Project For The Establishment, Operation, Management and Support of the NATO Insensitive Munitions Information Center (NIMIC) Signed At Brussels, London, Paris and Rome Entered Into Force May 27, 1999
Oona A. Hathaway, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith
2020· dataset· en· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · sts
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
War with ISIL: Should Parliament Decide?
Ryan Patrick Alford
2015· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutno abstractunlabeled
The History of Canadian Security Interests
Stephen Spence
2015· article· fr· Oral History Forum d'histoire orale· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Air Zoo: Free Admission Promotion
Mike McCardle, JoAnn L. Atkin
2016· article· en· Journal of case studies· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About