MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 13 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
How loud are echoes from exotic compact objects?
Luís Felipe Longo Micchi, Niayesh Afshordi, Cecilia Chirenti
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Relativistic spin dynamics for vector mesons
Xin-Li Sheng, Lucia Oliva, Zuo-tang Liang, Qun Wang, Xin-Nian Wang
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
affunlabeled
Multimessenger asteroseismology of core-collapse supernovae
John Ryan Westernacher-Schneider, Evan O’Connor, Erin O’Sullivan, Irene Tamborra, Meng-Ru Wu, Sean M. Couch +1 more
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
afffundunlabeled
Search for new phenomena in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math> collisions in final states with tau leptons, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math>-jets, and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector
G. Aad, B. Abbott, D. C. Abbott, A. Abed Abud, K. Abeling, D. K. Abhayasinghe +2812 more
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Bespoke dual resonance
Clifford Cheung, Grant N. Remmen
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
afffundunlabeled
Beyond lensing by the cosmological constant
Valerio Faraoni, Marianne Lapierre-Léonard
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
Light vectors coupled to bosonic currents
Jeff A. Dror, Robert Lasenby, Maxim Pospelov
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
Critical geometry of a thermal big bang
Niayesh Afshordi, João Magueijo
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Tests of Lorentz invariance at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
B. Aharmim, S. N. Ahmed, A. E. Anthony, N. Barros, E. W. Beier, A. Bellerive +125 more
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
Overtones and nonlinearities in binary black hole ringdowns
Matthew Giesler, Sizheng Ma, Keefe Mitman, Naritaka Oshita, Saul A. Teukolsky, Michael Boyle +8 more
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
Conformal bootstrap in embedding space
Jean-François Fortin, Witold Skiba
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
Penrose inequality in anti–de Sitter space
Viqar Husain, Suprit Singh
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
Mass-gap extreme mass ratio inspirals
Zhen Pan, Zhenwei Lyu, Huan Yang
2022· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About