MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,890 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,890 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 14 of 38

Labels cover 4 of 1,890 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,890 of 1,890 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
The Power of Polls?
Jason Roy, Shane Singh, Patrick Fournier
2021· book· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Expectations in Mass Elections: Back to the Future?
Marc Guinjoan, Pablo Simón, Sandra Bermúdez, Ignacio Lago
2013· article· en· Social Science Quarterly· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance
Cameron D. Anderson, R. Michael McGregor, Aaron Alexander Moore, Laura B. Stephenson
2015· article· en· Urban Affairs Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Correct Voting and Post-Election Regret
André Blais, Anja Kilibarda
2016· article· en· PS Political Science & Politics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Social Interactions and Legislative Activity
Nathan Canen, Matthew O. Jackson, Francesco Trebbi
2022· article· en· Journal of the European Economic Association· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Ranked Choice Voting and Minority Representation
Gerdus Benadè, Ruth Krebs Buck, Moon Duchin, Dara Gold, Thomas Weighill
2021· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The political fallout of air pollution
Luna Bellani, Stefano Ceolotto, Benjamin Elsner, Nico Pestel
2024· article· en· Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About