MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,100 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,100 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 14 of 42

Labels cover 193 of 2,100 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,100 of 2,100 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist
Simon Duchesne, Pierre Jannin
2007· article· en· NeuroImage· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
11
citations
affunlabeled
A global perspective on social stratification in science
Aliakbar Akbaritabar, Andrés F. Castro Torres, Vincent Larivière
2024· article· en· Humanities and Social Sciences Communications· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
11
citations
affvenuegemma · metaresearch+bibliometricsgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Research Impact Metrics: A Faculty Perspective
Mindy Thuna, Pam King
2017· article· en· Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
Factiva and Canadian Newsstand Major Dailies
S. Michelle Driedger, Jade Weimer
2015· article· en· Online Information Review· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · bibliometricsconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
How do you write and present research well? 7—Cite to get cited
Gregory S. Patience, Christian Patience, Daria C. Boffito, Paul A. Patience, François Bertrand
2016· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
11
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Bibliometric evaluation of negative publications from orthopedics and traumatology from the ten most influential journals of 2009–2010 and 2019–2020: A comparative study with the “Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research” journal, using the same analysis of submitted and accepted articles
Martin Bauters, Patrick Devos, Étienne L. Belzile, Sophie Putman, Henri Migаud, Julien Dаrtus
2023· article· en· Orthopaedics & Traumatology Surgery & Research· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
10
citations
venueno affunlabeled
When postpublication peer review stings
Roger Collier
2014· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
10
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Why Copy Editors Matter
Sylvia Izzo Hunter
2004· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
10
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Mapping philanthropic support of science
Louis Shekhtman, Alexander J. Gates, Albert-Ĺaszló Barabási
2024· article· en· Scientific Reports· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Predatory journals and their practices present a conundrum for systematic reviewers and evidence synthesisers of health research: A qualitative descriptive study
Danielle Pollock, Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer Stone, Edoardo Aromataris, Miloslav Klugar, Anna Mae Scott +6 more
2023· article· en· Research Synthesis Methods· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
10
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia
Hanna Hottenrott, Michael E. Rose, Cornelia Lawson
2021· preprint· en· Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+bibliometricsconsensus · none
10
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About