MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 16 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
RETHINKING THE DICEYAN DIALECTIC
Matthew Lewans
2008· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The New Borders of the Constitutional
Gavin W. Anderson
2013· article· en· Osgoode Hall law journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Proportionality and Pretense
Grant Huscroft
2012· article· en· Constitutional commentary· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Does Canada Need a Political Questions Doctrine
Q.C. D. Geoffrey Cowper, Lorne Sossin
2002· article· en· The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Charter Values and Administrative Justice
Lorne Sossin, Mark Friedman
2014· article· en· Supreme Court law review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affaboutno abstractunlabeled
Judicial Independence in Canada: A Critical Overview
Fabien Gélinas
2012· book-chapter· de· Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
What Is Responsive Judging?
Tania Sourdin, Archie Zariski
2018· book-chapter· en· Ius gentium· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Redefining Electoral Democracy in Canada
Keith Archer
2004· article· en· Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Three Narratives About Canadian Election Law
Michael Pal
2017· article· en· Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About