MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

864 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
864 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 17 of 18

Labels cover 133 of 864 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 864 of 864 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
Student Voices in Academic Integrity
Erin Hagen, Charlotte Sander
2021· article· en· Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Un exemple de coformation réussie du stagiaire
Michel Le Page, Colette Gervais
2012· book-chapter· fr· Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
So it Happened… What Now?
Francois Jordaan, Loie Gervais, Monique Dumontet
2023· article· en· Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affgemma · research_integritygpt · research_integritymodels agree
Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism
2020· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Dedication
2016· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Smith ( Funding Source: NSERC)
2009· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
BY
2014· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractgemma · research_integritygpt · metaresearch+research_integritymodels split
Publication Ethics and Graduate Students
Deborah C. Poff
2023· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About