MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,574 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,574 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 17 of 32

Labels cover 2 of 1,574 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,574 of 1,574 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Laptops and Teacher Transformation
Andrew Kitchenham
2009· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Designing a Makerspace for Pre- and In-Service Teachers
Marguerite Koole, Jordan Epp, Kerry Ann Anderson, Robert Hepner, Mohammad Hossain
2017· article· en· International Journal of Designs for Learning· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Understanding visual search tools through users' reactions
Efthimis N. Efthimiadis, Allison Druin, Andrew Large
2008· article· en· Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · sts
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Ability, Disability, and Picture Books
Linda Lucas Walling
2007· article· en· School Libraries Worldwide· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT FOR WHOLE GROUP ENGAGEMENT: A PILOT STUDY
Karen Swan, Annette Kratcoski, Mark van‘t Hooft, Deborah Campbell, Deborah Church Miller
2007· article· en· Advanced Technology for Learning· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+stsconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
“It Was a Real Eye-Opener”
Monique Shephard, Kasey Garrison
2024· article· en· School Libraries Worldwide· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Parenting researchers—an invisible divide
Luc Roberts, Ute Kothe, Hans‐Joachim Wieden
2020· article· en· EMBO Reports· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Book or Music Video?
Pavlina Ferfeli
2022· article· en· Interactive Film and Media Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About