MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,476 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,476 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 17 of 30

Labels cover 20 of 1,476 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,476 of 1,476 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
A Different Kind of Global Warming
Rebecca L. Craik
2007· article· en· Physical Therapy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Pilot studies for randomized clinical trials
Nancy Feeley, Sylvie Cossette
2015· article· en· Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
1
citations
affunlabeled
Validity of utilization review tools.
David Zitner, Donald Fay, Neil Ritchie
2000· letter· en· PubMed· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations
affaboutunlabeled
And a Good Time Was Had by All!
Norman L. Jones
2000· article· en· Canadian Respiratory Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Romania needs overseas reviewers
Illimar Altosaar
2012· letter· en· Nature· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Clinical trial registration
Leighton Chan, Allen W. Heinemann
2016· editorial· en· Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About