MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 17 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Kinematical gravitational charge algebra
Laurent Freidel, Etera R. Livine, Daniele Pranzetti
2020· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Measurement of the iron spectrum in cosmic rays by VERITAS
A. Archer, W. Benbow, R. Bird, Robert Brose, M. Buchovecky, V. Bugaev +51 more
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Reconstructing the primary CMB dipole
P. Daniel Meerburg, Joel Meyers, Alexander van Engelen
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Semivisible dark photon phenomenology at the GeV scale
Asli M. Abdullahi, Matheus Hostert, Daniele Massaro, Silvia Pascoli
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Combined search for electroweak production of winos, binos, higgsinos, and sleptons in proton-proton collisions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math>
Aram Hayrapetyan, A. Tumasyan, W. Adam, Janik Walter Andrejkovic, T. Bergauer, S. Chatterjee +2184 more
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Effective bias expansion for 21-cm cosmology in redshift space
Wenzer Qin, Katelin Schutz, Aaron Smith, Enrico Garaldi, Rahul Kannan, Tracy R. Slatyer +1 more
2022· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Carrollian motion in magnetized black hole horizons
Finnian Gray, David Kubizňák, T. Rick Perche, Jaime Redondo–Yuste
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Ultralight pion and superheavy baryon dark matter
Azadeh Maleknejad, Evan McDonough
2022· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Searches for double beta decay of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Xe</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>134</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>with EXO-200
J. B. Albert, G. Anton, I. Badhrees, P. S. Barbeau, Reimund Bayerlein, Diane M. Beck +86 more
2017· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
Vacuum energy density and gravitational entropy
Laurent Freidel, Jerzy Kowalski-Glikman, Robert G. Leigh, Djordje Minić
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
ANITA anomalous events and axion quark nuggets
Xunyu Liang, Ariel Zhitnitsky
2022· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
Data-driven muon-calibrated neutrino flux
Juan Pablo Yáñez, Anatoli Fedynitch
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
Origin of the quantum group symmetry in 3D quantum gravity
Maïté Dupuis, Laurent Freidel, Florian Girelli, Abdulmajid Osumanu, Julian Rennert
2025· preprint· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
Data-driven modeling of electron recoil nucleation in PICO <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mn>8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math> bubble chambers
C. Amole, M. Ardid, I. J. Arnquist, D. M. Asner, D. Baxter, E. Behnke +73 more
2019· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
Cosmogenic neutron production at Daya Bay
Fengpeng An, A. B. Balantekin, H. R. Band, M. Bishai, S. Blyth, D. Cao +191 more
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
afffundunlabeled
What makes a particle detector click
Erickson Tjoa, Irene López-Gutiérrez, Allison Sachs, Eduardo Martín-Martínez
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About