MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,755 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,755 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 18 of 56

Labels cover 3 of 2,755 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,755 of 2,755 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Parliamentary Declarations in 2021
Alexandra Logvin, RICHARD OSITASHVILI
2022· article· en· Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The Structural Bases of Canadian Party Preference
Richard Johnston
2012· book-chapter· en· University of British Columbia Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Federalism in Canada
J Richard
2005· article· en· Duquesne Law Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Assessing Performance
Keith Banting, Jack H. Nagel, Chelsea Schafer, Daniel Westlake
2019· book-chapter· en· The United States and Canada· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
The Debate About Compulsory Voting
John C. Courtney, Drew Wilby
2007· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Introduction to the First Edition
2006· book-chapter· en· McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Organizing Canadian Local Government
Zachary Spicer
2022· article· en· The School of Public Policy Publications· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Canada Political Divisions
2006· report· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Il Modello Westminster
Gianfranco Pasquino
2002· article· it· Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Decentralized Administration
Craig L. Arceneaux
2018· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About