MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

795 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
795 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 16

Labels cover 2 of 795 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 795 of 795 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Multivariate refinable Hermite interpolant
Bin Han, Thomas Yu, Bruce Piper
2003· article· en· Mathematics of Computation· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
affunlabeled
L-SYSTEM DESCRIPTION OF SUBDIVISION CURVES
Przemysław Prusinkiewicz, Faramarz Samavati, C. Ray Smith, Radoslaw Karwowski
2003· article· fr· International Journal of Shape Modeling· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Geometry of Moduli Spaces and Representation Theory
Roman Bezrukavnikov, Alexander Braverman, Zhiwei Yun
2017· book· en· IAS/Park City mathematics series· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affunlabeled
symSpline
Celine Latulipe, Stephen Mann, Craig S. Kaplan, Charlie Clarke
2006· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
38
citations
affunlabeled
DSCarver
Haisen Zhao, Hao Zhang, Shiqing Xin, Yuanmin Deng, Changhe Tu, Wenping Wang +2 more
2018· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
37
citations
affunlabeled
Topics in Spectral Geometry
Michael Levitin, Dan Mangoubi, Iosif Polterovich
2023· book· en· Graduate studies in mathematics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
37
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Local Specification of Surface Subdivision Algorithms
C. Ray Smith, Przemysław Prusinkiewicz, Faramarz Samavati
2004· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
36
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Generalized interpolating refinable function vectors
Bin Han, Soon-Geol Kwon, Xiaosheng Zhuang
2008· article· en· Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
L p solutions of refinement equations
Rong-Qing Jia, Ka‐Sing Lau, Ding‐Xuan Zhou
2001· article· en· Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Scalar and Hermite subdivision schemes
Serge Dubuc
2006· article· en· Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A note on finding clothoids
D.S. Meek, D. J. Walton
2004· article· en· Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Modeling with blocks
Luc Leblanc, Jocelyn Houle, Pierre Poulin
2011· article· en· The Visual Computer· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
affunlabeled
On the velocity of an implicit surface
Jos Stam, Ryan Schmidt
2011· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
affunlabeled
SOHO
Christian Lessig, Eugene Fiume
2008· article· en· ACM Transactions on Graphics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Some remarks on flows of line elements and frames
Alexander Givental, Boris Khesin, Jerrold E. Marsden, Alexander Varchenko, Oleg Viro, V. M. Zakalyukin
2009· book-chapter· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
27
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About