MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,149 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,149 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 23

Labels cover 1 of 1,149 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,149 of 1,149 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Algorithmic management and collective bargaining
Valerio De Stefano, Simon Taes
2022· article· en· Transfer European Review of Labour and Research· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
90
citations
affunlabeled
Editorial: Platform Surveillance
David Murakami Wood, Torin Monahan
2019· editorial· en· Surveillance & Society· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
88
citations
afffundunlabeled
Confronting the Business Models of Modern Slavery
Andrew Crane, Genevieve LeBaron, Kam Phung, Laya Behbahani, Jean Allain
2021· article· en· Journal of Management Inquiry· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
69
citations
afffundunlabeled
Platform capitalisms and platform cultures
Marc Steinberg, Lin Zhang, Rahul Mukherjee
2024· article· en· International Journal of Cultural Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Connective labor and social media
Megan Boler, Averie Macdonald, Christina Nitsou, Anne Harris
2014· article· en· Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
57
citations
affunlabeled
Feminist economic geography and the future of work
Emily Reid‐Musson, Daniel Cockayne, Lia Frederiksen, Nancy Worth
2020· article· en· Environment and Planning A Economy and Space· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
50
citations
affunlabeled
An Image of Society
Danaë Metaxa, Michelle A. Gan, Su Goh, Jeffrey T. Hancock, James A. Landay
2021· article· en· Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About