MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,890 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,890 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 38

Labels cover 4 of 1,890 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,890 of 1,890 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
When Citizens Decide
Patrick Fournier, Henk van der Kolk, R. Kenneth Carty, André Blais, Jonathan Rose
2011· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
179
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Civic Duty and Voter Turnout
André Blais, Christopher H. Achen
2018· article· en· Political Behavior· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
172
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Mixed-Member Electoral Systems
2003· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
172
citations
affunlabeled
Comparing Strategic Voting Under FPTP and PR
Paul R. Abramson, John H. Aldrich, André Blais, Matthew Diamond, Abraham Diskin, Indridi Indridason +2 more
2009· article· en· Comparative Political Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
168
citations
affaboutunlabeled
The Forgotten Side of Partisanship
Mike Medeiros, Alain Noël
2013· article· en· Comparative Political Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
159
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Issue Importance and Performance Voting
Patrick Fournier, André Blais, Richard Nadeau, Elisabeth Gidengil, Neil Nevitte
2003· article· en· Political Behavior· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
159
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Election pledges, party competition, and policymaking
Lucy Mansergh, Robert Thomson
2007· article· en· Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
158
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Electoral Systems and Turnout
André Blais, Kees Aarts
2006· article· en· Acta Politica· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
133
citations
affunlabeled
The Contemporary American Conservative Movement
Neil Gross, Thomas Medvetz, Rupert Henry Russell
2011· article· en· Annual Review of Sociology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
123
citations
affunlabeled
Do Voters Vote For Government Coalitions?
André Blais, John H. Aldrich, Indridi Indridason, Renan Levine
2006· article· en· Party Politics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
123
citations
affunlabeled
Head Start in Politics
Marc Hooghe, Dietlind Stolle, Patrick Stouthuysen
2004· article· en· Party Politics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
122
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Accounting for the Age Gap in Turnout
Daniel Rubenson, André Blais, Patrick Fournier, Elisabeth Gidengil, Neil Nevitte
2004· article· en· Acta Politica· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
120
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Polarization in America: two possible futures
Gordon Heltzel, Kristin Laurin
2020· review· en· Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
118
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Constituency Influence in Parliament
Stuart Soroka, Erin Penner, Kelly Blidook
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Political Science· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
114
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Referendums and deliberative democracy
Lawrence LeDuc
2015· article· en· Electoral Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
112
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About