MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,082 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,082 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 42

Labels cover 1 of 2,082 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,082 of 2,082 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Reevaluating dune scaling relations
R. W. Bradley, Jeremy G. Venditti
2016· article· en· Earth-Science Reviews· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
177
citations
affunlabeled
Response of bed surface patchiness to reductions in sediment supply
Peter A. Nelson, Jeremy G. Venditti, W. E. Dietrich, James W. Kirchner, Hiroshi Ikeda, Fujiko Iseya +1 more
2009· article· en· Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
150
citations
affunlabeled
Mobility of bed material in Harris Creek
Michael Church, Marwan A. Hassan
2002· article· en· Water Resources Research· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
146
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Critical specific stream power in gravel-bed rivers
François Petit, Frédéric Gob, Geoffrey Houbrechts, Ali A. Assani
2005· article· en· Geomorphology· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
141
citations
affunlabeled
The trajectory of geomorphology
Michael Church
2010· article· en· Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
140
citations
affunlabeled
Biomic river restoration: A new focus for river management
Matthew F. Johnson, Colin R. Thorne, Janine M. Castro, G. Mathias Kondolf, Celeste Searles Mazzacano, Stewart B. Rood +1 more
2019· article· en· River Research and Applications· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
135
citations
affunlabeled
Bed form initiation from a flat sand bed
Jeremy G. Venditti, Michael Church, Sean J. Bennett
2005· article· en· Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
129
citations
affunlabeled
A cellular model of river meandering
Tom Coulthard, Marco Van De Wiel
2005· article· en· Earth Surface Processes and Landforms· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
126
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About