MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Information Architecture and Usability
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

99 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
99 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 2

Labels cover 1 of 99 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 99 of 99 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Inside ASIS&T: ASIS&T meeting news
2007· article· en· Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
ISSUE INFORMATION‐TOC
Mickey Stinnett, Lisa Hoverman, J.S. Brtis, Dan Nicholas, Kerry Lunney, Marilee J. Wheaton +14 more
2020· paratext· en· Insight· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
President's page
Gary Marchionini
2010· article· en· Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Editor's desktop
Irene L. Travis
2009· article· en· Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЙ МЕНЕДЖМЕНТ И УПРАВЛЕНИЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ ИНФОРМАЦИЕЙ КАК КОМПОНЕНТЫ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ ИНФОРМАЦИОННОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ КАНАДЫ
Тризно Тамара Александровна
2013· article· ru· Исторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Editor's desktop
Irene L. Travis
2013· article· en· Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Looking at information behaviour from a transitional perspective
Jenny Bronstein, Alison Hicks, Jette Seiden Hyldegård, Pamela J. McKenzie, Ian Ruthven, Gunilla Widén
2022· article· en· Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About