MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Psychological Testing and Assessment
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

223 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
223 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 5

Labels cover 0 of 223 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 223 of 223 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Basic Personality Inventory
Ronald R. Holden, G. Cynthia Fekken
2017· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
fundvenueno affno abstractunlabeled
Predicting compliance of children with and without developmental delay.
Rene Hiebert, Garry L. Martin, C. T. Yu, Jennifer R. Thorsteinsson, Toby L. Martin
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Motivational Aspects
Anne‐Marie Hill
2007· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
6
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Some designs related to group actions.
M. R. Darafsheh, Али Реза Ашрафи, Maryam Khademi
2008· article· en· Ars Combinatoria· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Verbal Comprehension Index
Rael T. Lange
2010· book-chapter· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Rorschach Assessment of Complex Trauma in Youth
David Ephraim
2020· article· en· Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Human Figure Drawings
Whitney D. Taylor, Catherine M. Lee
2015· other· en· The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Recherches en psychologie de l’adulte
René Bédard
2009· article· fr· Revue des sciences de l éducation· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Evidence‐Based Assessment
Zoé Therrien, John Hunsley
2015· other· en· The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About