MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical Review A
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

843 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002017
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
843 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 17

Labels cover 0 of 843 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 843 of 843 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Determinism in the one-way model
Vincent Danos, Elham Kashefi
2006· article· en· Physical Review A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
144
citations
affunlabeled
Geometric measure of entanglement for symmetric states
R. Hübener, Matthias Kleinmann, Tzu-Chieh Wei, Carlos E. González-Guillén, Otfried Gühne
2009· article· en· Physical Review A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
142
citations
affunlabeled
Intense laser-field ionization of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>enhanced by two-electron dynamics
Kenji Harumiya, Hirohiko Kono, Y. Fujimura, Isao Kawata, André D. Bandrauk
2002· article· lv· Physical Review A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
134
citations
afffundunlabeled
Classicality in discrete Wigner functions
Cecilia Cormick, Ernesto F. Galvão, Daniel Gottesman, Juan Pablo Paz, A. O. Pittenger
2006· article· en· Physical Review A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
131
citations
afffundunlabeled
Single-atom switching in photonic crystals
Marian Florescu, Sajeev John
2001· article· en· Physical Review A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
109
citations
affunlabeled
Permutation-invariant quantum codes
Yingkai Ouyang
2014· article· en· Physical Review A· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
95
citations
affunlabeled
Electronic noise in optical homodyne tomography
J. Appel, Dallas Hoffman, Eden Figueroa, A. I. Lvovsky
2007· article· en· Physical Review A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
94
citations
afffundunlabeled
Fabry-Perot microcavity for diamond-based photonics
Erika Hissong, Maximilian Ruf, Mark Dimock, Alexandre Bourassa, Jack C. Sankey, Lilian Childress
2015· article· en· Physical Review A· Materials Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
92
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About