MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Primate Behavior and Ecology
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,688 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,688 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 34

Labels cover 1 of 1,688 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,688 of 1,688 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
Dunking Behavior in American Crows
Julie Morand‐Ferron
2005· article· en· The Wilson Bulletin· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Biological Motion Captures Attention
Jay Pratt, P. Radulescu, Ruipeng Guo, Naseem Al-Aidroos, Richard A. Abrams
2010· article· en· Journal of Vision· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Standing over and hugging in wild wolves
Łukasz Mech
2001· article· en· The Canadian Field-Naturalist· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The Faces Monkeys Make
Eliza Bliss‐Moreau, Gilda Moadab
2017· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
String-pulling by the common marmoset
Mathilde Bertrand, Michael Karkuszewski, Rhonda Kersten, Jean‐Jacques Orban de Xivry, J. Andrew Pruszynski
2025· article· en· Journal of Neurophysiology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Play
Sergio M. Pellis, Vivien C. Pellis
2021· reference-entry· en· Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Heterochrony in Hybrid Macaques
Nicole Taylor, Michael A. Schillaci
2008· article· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Rescue, Rehabilitation, and Reintroduction
Siobhan Speiran, Tephillah Jeyaraj-Powell, Laurie M. Kauffman, Michelle A. Rodrigues
2023· book-chapter· en· Developments in primatology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About