MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,725 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,725 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 25 of 35

Labels cover 2 of 1,725 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,725 of 1,725 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Editors' notes
Liesel A. Ritchie, Wayne MacDonald
2010· article· en· New Directions for Evaluation· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Magnac-Laval – Les Tourettes
2013· other· fr· OpenEdition (OpenEdition)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Economic activity during extreme events
John G. Galbraith
2025· article· en· Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Private Versus Social Responses to a Pandemic
Miguel Casares, Paul Gomme, Hashmat Khan
2024· preprint· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Critical Incidents
Laura Huey, Lorna Ferguson, Judith P. Andersen
2025· book-chapter· en· SpringerBriefs in criminology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Laws and Crisis Management
Saptarishi Bandopadhyay
2016· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Miklem marbut mal-loghba tal-futbol
2008· article· eo· OAR@UM (University of Malta)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Reconsidering Disaster Risk Reduction
2025· book-chapter· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Cities and Earthquakes
2025· book-chapter· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Risk and Resilience
Jacques Chevalier
2023· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About