MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
International Law and Aviation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,681 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,681 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 34

Labels cover 2 of 1,681 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,681 of 1,681 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Droit constitutionnel étranger
Guy Scoffoni, David Annoussamy, Andrew S. Butler, Claude Klein, José Woehrling
2003· article· fr· Revue française de droit constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
STAR STILL SHINING BRIGHT
Jaan Albrecht
2002· article· en· Airlines international· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Public Panel Rapporteur Session
Matthew Courteau, William Ogden
2017· article· en· The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Foreign Law and Opinion in State Courts
Mark Wendell DeLaquil
2006· article· en· Albany law review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Case concerning questions of interpretation and application of the 1971 montreal convention arising from the aerial incident at lockerbie (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v. United Kingdom) Affaire relative à des questions d’interprétation et d’application de la convention de montréal de 1971 résultant de l’incident aérien de lockerbie(Jamahiriya arabe libyenne c. Royaume-uni)
2000· book-chapter· fr· Reports of judgments, advisory opinions and orders· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
AIR SERVICE INVESTMENT
James Ott
2003· article· en· Aviation week & space technology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Appendix: The New Brunswick Declaration
2016· book-chapter· en· University of Toronto Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Then and Now: The Charter at 25
Richard Moon
2007· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Air Operations at Dieppe
David Hall
2003· article· en· Canadian military history· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About