MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
How Harper Will Reshape Canada's Courts
Wayne A. Mackay
2011· article· en· Knowledge@SchulichLaw· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Canadian constitutional dilemmas revisited
Anne ImObersteg
2016· article· en· Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
The Unwritten Principle of Democracy
Michael Pal
2019· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Constitutional litigation in Canada
Andrew K. Lokan, Christopher M. Dassios
2006· book· en· Thomson/Carswell eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Dimensions of Indian Judicial Activism
Rajkumar Singh
2017· article· en· Cross-cultural communication· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
The Case for Tribunal Standing in Canada
Noel Semple
2007· article· en· Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
34. Chief Justice of Ontario
Roy McMurtry
2013· book-chapter· en· University of Toronto Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Constitutional symposium: Edmonton, Alberta
Eugene Yuki
2016· article· en· Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affaboutunlabeled
The Rule of Law in Canada
Robin Elliot
2007· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About