MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,498 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,498 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 29 of 30

Labels cover 4 of 1,498 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,498 of 1,498 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Microfluidic Packaging Process
Ebrahim Ghafar‐Zadeh, Mohamad Sawan
2010· book-chapter· en· Analog circuits and signal processing/Analog circuits and signal processing series· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Electrokinetic Focusing
Tomasz Glawde, Carolyn L. Ren
2014· book-chapter· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundunlabeled
Accurate Kd via Transient Incomplete Separation
Nicolas Sisavath, Jean Luc Rukundo, J. C. Yves Le Blanc, Victor A. Galievsky, Jiayin Bao, Sven Kochmann +2 more
2019· preprint· en· ChemRxiv· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
A Novel Method for Rapid Microfabrication
Resul Saritas, Majed Al‐Ghamdi, M. Taylan Daş, Eihab Abdel‐Rahman
2018· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Modeling of micro impingement flows
Ashwin Acharya, Muthukumaran Packirisamy
2006· article· en· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Preparation of ultra-thin elastomeric films
Hamza K. Khattak, Guanhua Lu, Lauren A. Dutcher, Michael A. Brook, Kari Dalnoki‐Veress
2023· article· en· The European Physical Journal E· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
10.51847/9PYDLF1uiv
Jason Kee Chian Chin, Chin Chin Sieo
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
DNA Separation Using Photoelectrophoretic Traps
Avital Braiman, Thomas Thundat, Fedor Rudakov
2011· article· en· DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About