MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Social Media and Politics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,257 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,257 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 29 of 46

Labels cover 12 of 2,257 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,257 of 2,257 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affvenueaboutunlabeled
Assessing Media Democracy
Geneviève A. Bonin
2014· article· en· Canadian Journal of Communication· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Twitter
Alfred Hermida
2012· other· en· The International Encyclopedia of Communication· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Technoethics and Digital Democracy for Future Citizens
Rocci Luppicini
2017· book-chapter· en· Advances in electronic government, digital divide, and regional development book series· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
What’s political Twitter talking about?
Kylah J. Hedding, Kevin Ripka
2018· article· en· The Agenda Setting Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Collective Activism
Craig Doidge, I. J. Alexander Dyck, Liyan Yang
2024· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Twitter Revolution
Christopher J. Schneider
2021· other· en· The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Interological Turn in Media Ecology
Peter Zhang, Eric McLuhan
2016· article· en· Canadian Journal of Communication· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
The Use and Abuse of Digital Democracy
Rachel Baarda, Rocci Luppicini
2014· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Making Media Public: From Discussion to Action?
Nicole S. Cohen, Sonja Macdonald, Patricia Mazepa, David Skinner
2011· article· en· Canadian Journal of Communication· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About