MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,890 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,890 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 38

Labels cover 4 of 1,890 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,890 of 1,890 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
How Do Ideas Matter?
Alan M. Jacobs
2008· article· en· Comparative Political Studies· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
109
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Antipartyism and Third-Party Vote Choice
Éric Bélanger
2004· article· en· Comparative Political Studies· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
106
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
The calculus of voting: An empirical test
André Blais, Robert Young, Miriam Lapp
2000· article· en· European Journal of Political Research· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
106
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Trump Voters and the White Working Class
Stephen L. Morgan, Jiwon Lee
2018· article· en· Sociological Science· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · sts
104
citations
affunlabeled
A Theory of Policy Expertise
Steven Callander
2008· article· en· Quarterly Journal of Political Science· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
103
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Do Leaders' Personalities Really Matter?
2002· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
98
citations
affunlabeled
Turnout in Elections
André Blais
2009· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
91
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Regional Elections in Multi-Level Systems
Charlie Jeffery, Dan Hough
2003· article· en· European Urban and Regional Studies· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
90
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Degrees of Democracy
Stuart Soroka, Christopher Wlezien
2009· book· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
86
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About