MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,728 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,728 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 55

Labels cover 3 of 2,728 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,728 of 2,728 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Varieties of Spoken French
Sylvain Detey, J. Durand, Bernard Laks, Chantal Lyche
2016· book· en· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
123
citations
affunlabeled
Contrast is irrelevant in phonology
Charles Reiss
2017· book-chapter· en· Linguistik aktuell· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
120
citations
affunlabeled
Lip Movement Exaggerations During Infant-Directed Speech
Jordan R. Green, Ignatius S. B. Nip, Erin M. Wilson, Antje S. Mefferd, Yana Yunusova
2010· article· en· Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
113
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Canadian French Vowel Harmony
Gabriel Christophe Poliquin
2006· article· en· MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
103
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A featural paradox in Votic harmony
Lev Blumenfeld, Ida Toivonen
2016· article· en· Natural Language & Linguistic Theory· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
101
citations
afffundunlabeled
Phonology without universal grammar
Diana Archangeli, Douglas Pulleyblank
2015· article· en· Frontiers in Psychology· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
100
citations
affunlabeled
COMPREHENSION-BASED PRACTICE
Pavel Trofimovich, Patsy M. Lightbown, Randall Halter, Hyojin Song
2009· article· en· Studies in Second Language Acquisition· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
96
citations
affunlabeled
The Syntax–Prosody Interface
Ryan Bennett, Emily Elfner
2018· article· en· Annual Review of Linguistics· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
94
citations
affunlabeled
Gradient Vowel Harmony in Oceanic
John Alderete, Sara Finley
2016· article· en· Language and Linguistics 語言暨語言學· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
93
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About