MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Political and Economic history of UK and US
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

874 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
874 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 18

Labels cover 0 of 874 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 874 of 874 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
We Were Made for These Times
Sally Thorne
2025· editorial· en· Nursing Inquiry· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Afterwords on aftermaths
Lars Waldorf
2019· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
3. Making Citizens In Magnaville
Geoffrey Whitehall, Cedric Johnson
2010· book-chapter· en· University of Minnesota Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Blueprint
2017· book· en· University of Toronto Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
The Politics of Evasion
Robert Latham
2016· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Monnet's Error?
Luigi Guiso, Paola Sapienza, Luigi Zingales
2014· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affunlabeled
London, 1984
Stephen Brooke
2024· book· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Visually Viral Prime Minister
Chaseten Remillard, Lindsey M. Bertrand, Alina Fisher
2019· book-chapter· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
From Wall Street to Bay Street
Joe Martin, Chris Kobrak
2018· book· en· University of Toronto Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Conservatives and the City
E. H. H. Green
2004· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About