MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,879 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,879 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 30 of 78

Labels cover 5 of 3,879 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,879 of 3,879 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundno abstractunlabeled
A cytogenetic method for stacking gene pairs in common wheat
J. B. Thomas, Erik Riedel, Abdellah Benabdelmouna, K. C. Armstrong
2004· article· en· Theoretical and Applied Genetics· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
fundvenueno affunlabeled
10.51847/TWLFuDY
Sheikh Arslan Sehgal, Rana Adnan Tahir, Muhammad Nawaz, Muhammad Younas
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
4
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
AC Corinne hard red spring wheat
D. G. Humphreys, T. F. Townley‐Smith, R. I. H. McKenzie, E. Czarnecki
2001· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Registration of ‘Bunker’ Triticale
Donald F. Salmon, James H. Helm, P. E. Juskiw, J. M. Nyachiro, Susan Albers, Colin Bergen +1 more
2007· article· en· Journal of Plant Registrations· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Registration of DT676 Loose Smut Resistant Durum Wheat Germplasm
R. E. Knox, Heather Campbell, J. M. Clarke, M. R. Fernandez, J. G. McLeod, R. M. DePauw
2008· article· en· Journal of Plant Registrations· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
AAC Elie hard red spring wheat
Richard D. Cuthbert, R. M. DePauw, R. E. Knox, Asheesh K. Singh, T. N. McCaig, T. Fetch +1 more
2016· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
AAC W1876 hard red spring wheat
Richard D. Cuthbert, R. M. DePauw, R. E. Knox, Arti Singh, T. N. McCaig, Brent McCallum +1 more
2018· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Stride oat
Jennifer W. Mitchell Fetch, A. Tekauz, P. D. Brown, Nancy Ames, J. Chong, T. Fetch +5 more
2013· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reply to: Where was wheat domesticated?
Xuebo Zhao, Yafei Guo, Fei Lü
2023· letter· en· Nature Plants· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
KANE hard red spring wheat
S. L. Fox, D. G. Humphreys, P. D. Brown, T. F. Townley‐Smith, Brent McCallum, T. G. Fetch +4 more
2007· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
afffundvenueaboutunlabeled
CDC Vivid durum wheat
Curtis Pozniak
2012· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
AAC Current durum wheat
A. K. Singh, J. M. Clarke, R. M. DePauw, R. E. Knox, T. N. McCaig, Richard D. Cuthbert
2014· article· en· Canadian Journal of Plant Science· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About