MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,890 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,890 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 32 of 38

Labels cover 4 of 1,890 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,890 of 1,890 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
The Broader Implications of Uneven Turnout
Zoltan L. Hajnal
2009· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Tables
2022· book-chapter· en· University of Toronto Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
posterior_anes_1996.rds
Gregory Eady, Peter John Loewen
2020· dataset· es· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Landscape
Richard Johnston, Michael G. Hagen, Kathleen Hall Jamieson
2004· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
tables_fig_ind_unweighted.R
Gabriel López-Moctezuma, Léonard Wantchekon, Daniel Rubenson, Thomas Fujiwara, Pe Lero Cecilia
2020· dataset· ca· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Turnout
Pippa Norris
2004· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
August 2001
2007· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
posterior_anes_2016.rds
Gregory Eady, Peter John Loewen
2020· dataset· es· Harvard Dataverse· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Voter Turnout and the Electoral Crisis
Catus Brooks, Jocelyne Praud
2018· article· en· Arts and Social Sciences Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About