MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,207 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,207 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 33 of 45

Labels cover 3 of 2,207 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,207 of 2,207 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/0967-0653(96)83074-2
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
1
citations
affunlabeled
Global agricultural lands in the year 2015
Zia Mehrabi, Kaitai Tong, Julie Fortin, Radost Stanimirova, M. A. Friedl, Navin Ramankutty
2024· preprint· en· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Ecosystem Services
Jessica Dempsey
2017· other· en· International Encyclopedia of Geography· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Land Quality
J. Vernon Henderson, Adam Storeygard, David Weil
2020· report· en· National Bureau of Economic Research· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Spatial Analysis of Ecological Data
Marie‐Josée Fortin
2015· book-chapter· en· Encyclopedia of GIS· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
SPATIAL ANALYSIS
James Conolly, Mark Lake
2006· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Robust Spatial Network Analysis
Tim Evans
2013· article· en· Figshare· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Regenerative Agriculture
Muhammad Yousaf Raza, Mukhtar Ahmad, Ghulām Qādir, Saima Ikram, Shakeel Ahmad, Amjad Malik
2025· book-chapter· en· Advances in global change research· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The City Nature Challenge 2020
Mary B. Kennedy, D. G. Ireland, Andrea T. Hart
2020· article· en· Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About