MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 36 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Search for pair-produced vectorlike quarks coupling to light quarks in the lepton plus jets final state using 13 TeV <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math> collisions with the ATLAS detector
G. Aad, Erlend Aakvaag, B. Abbott, Sara Abdelhameed, K. Abeling, Nils Julius Abicht +2813 more
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Unveiling the heavy neutrino nature at LHCb
G. A. Vasquez, J. A. Zamora Saa
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Quantum imaging using relativistic detectors
Nicholas Bornman, Achim Kempf, Andrew Forbes
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Superfluid dark matter flow around cosmic strings
Heliudson Bernardo, Robert Brandenberger, Aline Favero
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Observation of the decay <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> at Belle II
I. Adachi, L. Aggarwal, H. Ahmed, H. Aihara, Н. Акопов, M. Alhakami +378 more
2025· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Chiral fermion anomaly as a memory effect
Adrián del Río, Iván Agulló
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Dark matter direct detection on the Moon
Andréa Gaspert, P. Giampa, Navin McGinnis, David E. Morrissey
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Characterization of the background spectrum in DAMIC at SNOLAB
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, D. Amidei, I. J. Arnquist, D. Baxter, Gustavo Cancelo, Brenda A. Cervantes-Vergara +26 more
2022· preprint· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Variations on the Dirac string
Bradley Cownden, Andrew R. Frey
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Deep in the knotted black hole
Massimiliano Spadafora, Manar Naeem, María Rosa Preciado-Rivas, Robert B. Mann, Jorma Louko
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Cosmic strings in the complex symmetron model
Ali Nezhadsafavi, Levon Pogosian
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
afffundunlabeled
Renormalizable models of flavor-specific scalars
Brian Batell, A. Freitas, Ahmed Ismail, David McKeen, Mudit Rai
2021· preprint· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Axion strings from string axions
James M. Cline, Christos Litos, Wei Xue
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About