MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,691 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,691 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 39 of 74

Labels cover 1 of 3,691 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,691 of 3,691 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Magnetic Field in the Milky Way Filamentary Bone G47
Ian Stephens, Philip C. Myers, Catherine Zucker, James M. Jackson, B. G. Andersson, Rowan J. Smith +18 more
2022· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
Exciting spiral arms in protoplanetary discs from flybys
Jeremy L. Smallwood, Chao‐Chin Yang, Zhaohuan Zhu, Rebecca G. Martin, Ruobing Dong, Nicolás Cuello +1 more
2023· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
High Resolution CO Observation of Massive Star Forming Regions
Pamela Klaassen, C. D. Wilson, E. R. Keto, Qizhou Zhang, Roberto Galván-Madrid, Hauyu Baobab Liu
2011· article· en· Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
The JCMT Gould Belt Survey: Dense Core Clusters in Orion B
Helen Kirk, Doug Johnstone, James Lane, J. Buckle, David Berry, H. Broekhoven-Fiene +13 more
2016· article· en· Max Planck Digital Library· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
On the equations of warped disc dynamics
C. P. Dullemond, C. N. Kimmig, J. J. Zanazzi
2021· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
870 μm Dust Continuum of the Youngest Protostars in Ophiuchus
Frankie J. Encalada, Leslie W. Looney, John Tobin, Sarah Sadavoy, Dominique Segura-Cox, Erin G. Cox +2 more
2021· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
Deep inside low-mass stars
C. Charbonnel, S. Talon
2008· article· en· Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About