MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

479 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
479 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 10

Labels cover 0 of 479 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 479 of 479 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Does Cancer Biology Rely on Parrondo’s Principles?
Jean‐Pascal Capp, Aurora M. Nedelcu, Antoine M. Dujon, Benjamín Roche, Francesco Catania, Beáta Újvári +2 more
2021· review· en· Cancers· Mathematics
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
MATHEMATICAL MODELING OF THE BRAIN
G. Tenti, S. Sivaloganathan, James M. Drake
2008· review· en· Neurosurgery· Mathematics
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
11
citations
affunlabeled
Splitting methods for Hamilton‐Jacobi equations
Agnès Tourin
2005· article· en· Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations· Mathematics
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
11
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
A Hele–Shaw problem for tumor growth
Antoine Mellet, Benoı̂t Perthame, Fernando Quirós
2017· preprint· en· Journal of Functional Analysis· Mathematics
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
11
citations
afffundunlabeled
Modelling microtube driven invasion of glioma
Thomas Hillen, Nadia Loy, Kevin J. Painter, Ryan Thiessen
2023· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Biology· Mathematics
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Applications and evolution of 3D cancer-immune cell models
Ileana L. Co, Aleksandra Fomina, Michelle Nurse, Alison P. McGuigan
2024· review· en· Trends in biotechnology· Mathematics
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+research_integrityconsensus · none
9
citations
affunlabeled
The Fractal Viewpoint of Tumors and Nanoparticles
Αθανάσιος Αλεξίου, Christos Tsagkaris, Stylianos Chatzichronis, Andreas Koulouris, Ioannis Haranas, Ioannis Gkigkitzis +8 more
2022· review· en· Current Medicinal Chemistry· Mathematics
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
8
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About