MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,079 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20162025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,079 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 42

Labels cover 5 of 2,079 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,079 of 2,079 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Search for heavy neutrinos with the T2K near detector ND280
K. Abe, R. Akutsu, A. Ali, C. Andreopoulos, L. Anthony, M. Antonova +319 more
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
110
citations
affunlabeled
Evaluating the price of tiny kinetic mixing
Tony Gherghetta, Jörn Kersten, Keith A. Olive, Maxim Pospelov
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
107
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Emergent times in holographic duality
Samuel Leutheusser, Hong Liu
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
100
citations
afffundunlabeled
Thermodynamics of Lorentzian Taub-NUT spacetimes
Robie A. Hennigar, David Kubizňák, Robert B. Mann
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
afffundunlabeled
Improved search for heavy neutrinos in the decay <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>π</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">→</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>
A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo, M. Aoki, M. Blecher, D. Britton, Dorothea Vom Bruch, D. Bryman +18 more
2018· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
97
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Gravitational portals in the early Universe
Simon Cléry, Yann Mambrini, Keith A. Olive, Sarunas Verner
2022· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
96
citations
afffundunlabeled
QCD analogy for quantum gravity
Bob Holdom, Jing Ren
2016· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
96
citations
afffundunlabeled
Free energy from replica wormholes
Netta Engelhardt, Sebastian Fischetti, Alexander Maloney
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
95
citations
afffundunlabeled
Black hole dynamics in Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton theory
Eric Hirschmann, Luis Lehner, Steven L. Liebling, Carlos Palenzuela
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
89
citations
afffundunlabeled
Higher spin dynamics in gravity and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> celestial symmetries
Laurent Freidel, Daniele Pranzetti, Ana-Maria Raclariu
2022· article· lv· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
89
citations
afffundunlabeled
Can scalars have asymptotic symmetries?
Miguel Campiglia, Leonardo Coito, Sebastian Mizera
2018· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
89
citations
afffundunlabeled
SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum annealer
Sarmed A Rahman, Randy Lewis, Emanuele Mendicelli, Sarah J. M. Powell
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
88
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About