MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,076 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,076 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 82

Labels cover 359 of 4,076 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,076 of 4,076 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals
Peter C. Austin, Janet E. Hux
2002· article· en· Journal of Vascular Surgery· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
408
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
Blakeley B. McShane, Ulf Böckenholt, Karsten T. Hansen
2016· review· en· Perspectives on Psychological Science· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
407
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile
Brian A. Nosek, Emorie D Beck, Lorne Campbell, Jessica Kay Flake, Tom E Hardwicke, David Thomas Mellor +2 more
2019· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · metaresearch
355
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+bibliometricsgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Level of Evidence in Orthopaedic Journals
William T. Obremskey, Nick Pappas, Emad Attallah-Wasif, Paul Tornetta, Mohit Bhandari
2005· article· en· Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
324
citations
affunlabeled
Updated Tests for Small-study Effects in Meta-analyses
Roger Harbord, Ross Harris, Jonathan A C Sterne
2009· article· en· The Stata Journal Promoting communications on statistics and Stata· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
323
citations
affunlabeled
RAMESES publication standards: meta‐narrative reviews
Geoff Wong, Trisha Greenhalgh, Gill Westhorp, Jeanette Buckingham, Ray Pawson
2013· article· en· Journal of Advanced Nursing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
317
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research
Douglas G. Altman, Iveta Simera, John Hoey, David Moher, Ken Schulz
2008· article· en· The Lancet· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
313
citations
affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels split
Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology
Mark Crowther, Wendy Lim
2010· review· en· Blood· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
308
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions
Hanan Khalil, Micah D.J. Peters, Andrea C. Tricco, Danielle Pollock, Lyndsay Alexander, Patricia McInerney +2 more
2020· article· en· Journal of Clinical Epidemiology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
305
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About