MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Religion, Ecology, and Ethics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

575 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
575 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 12

Labels cover 2 of 575 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 575 of 575 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
An Ecological Theology of Liberation
2019· other· en· OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
WHY SHOULD THEOLOGY BE UNNATURAL?
Colin Grant
2007· article· en· Modern Theology· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Preservation by ‘Letting Go’
Annette Ahern
2006· article· en· Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Death of Life
Sean McDonagh
2002· article· en· Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Climate and Logic
2012· book-chapter· en· Boston studies in the philosophy of science· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Wisdom in the New Testament
Mariam Kamell Kovalishyn
2021· book-chapter· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
R. S. Thomas
Chris Morgan
2018· book· war· Manchester University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Environmental Crisis as The Ultimate Life Issue
Arnold Donozo
2018· article· en· Scientia - The International Journal on the Liberal Arts· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About