MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Web and Library Services
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

655 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
655 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 14

Labels cover 18 of 655 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 655 of 655 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
From Book Talks to BookTok
Jennifer Moore, Sarah Evans, Barbara Schultz‐Jones
2023· article· en· IASL Annual Conference Proceedings· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Roundtable: Should library workers learn to code?
Ruth Kitchin Tillman, Alan Harnum, Danielle Robichaud, Anna-Sophia Zingarelli-Sweet, Brad Houston
2018· article· en· Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Service Multipliers, Service Visibility
J. Tuomas Harviainen
2014· article· en· Design Management Review· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
The HLABC Webcasting–Webconferencing Pilot Project
Devon Greyson, Anne Allgaier
2012· article· en· Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l Association de bilbiothèques de la santé du Canada· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
WLANs for the 21st Century Library
Cal Calamari
2009· article· en· Teacher librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Learning from a Distance
Guinsly Mondésir, Lisl Schoner-Saunders
2023· article· en· Bulletin - Association of Canadian Map Libraries and Archives (ACMLA)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Towards an Architecture for Active Reading
Christian Wittern
2013· article· en· Scholarly and Research Communication· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affgemma · no categorygpt · no categorymodels agree
Digital Library and Digital Reference Service
Jia Liu
2011· book-chapter· en· SensePublishers eBooks· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Applying Open Access to Library Technologies
Geoffrey Little
2012· article· en· The Journal of Academic Librarianship· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Use of Twitter by a Public Library During the Pandemic
Dinesh Rathi
2021· article· en· Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Social Marketing
Barbara Immroth, Bill Lukenbill
2021· article· en· IASL Annual Conference Proceedings· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Going digital: a guide for book publishers
MariÈve Mauve Pagé
2008· dissertation· en· Orthopedics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Putting Your School Library Online.
Barbara Braxton
2004· article· en· Teacher librarian· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Exploring Social Software at UBC Library: The TOTS Series
Lindsay Ure, Susan Atkey, Katherine Miller
2009· article· en· Partnership The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
School Libraries in Spain
Mònica Baró Llambias, Teresa Mañà Terré, Inés Miret Bernal, Inmaculada Vellosillo Gonsález
2021· article· en· IASL Annual Conference Proceedings· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Libraries: Sustaining the Digital Reader Experience
Elisabet Brynge, Holly Case, Ellen Forsyth, Gary Green, Ulf Hölke
2015· article· en· Scholarly and Research Communication· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
E‐commerce in libraries. Sponsored by SIG LT
Heidi Fogelberg, Peter Scott, Marjorie M.K. Hlava, Alan Pannell
2003· article· en· Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About