MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Robotics and Automated Systems
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

295 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
295 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 6 of 6

Labels cover 0 of 295 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 295 of 295 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Introduction To the JEEG Special Issue On IWAGPR2017
Antonis Giannopoulos, Nectaria Diamanti, Craig Warren
2018· article· en· Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Relationships with Objects and Robots
Lauren Hall
2007· article· en· EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Workshop on robot vision (RV 2015)
Jacky Baltes
2016· article· en· Pacific-Rim Symposium on Image and Video Technology· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Natural Language Processing Empowered Mobile Computing
Tianyong Hao, Raymond K. Wong, Zhe He, Haoran Xie, Tak-Lam Wong, Fu Lee Wang
2018· article· en· Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Human-Computer Interaction –INTERACT 2013 Proceedings, Part IV
Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, Marco Winckler
2013· other· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Impossibles & Autonomous 4-Legged Soccer Team on AIBO Platform.
Hamid Reza Vaezi Joze, Nima Asadi, Seyed Hossein Kaffash Bokharaei, Navid Zolghadr, Seyed Hossein Khasteh
2008· article· en· Automation, Robotics and Control Systems· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Visual field specializations in mouse dLGN
Kuwook Cha, Aline Giselle Rangel Olguin, Reza Sharif, Erik P. Cook, Arjun Krishnaswamy
2025· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previous

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About