MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,388 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,388 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 62 of 68

Labels cover 2 of 3,388 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,388 of 3,388 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
Ice thoughts.
2016· other· en· Open Access at Essex (University of Essex)· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affunlabeled
Reviews
Robert E. Sheriff, William R. Green, Ray Wood, Abe Palaz, B. C. Scheffers, Fouad Michael
2002· article· en· The Leading Edge· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Wave Propagation and Seismic Modeling
Gary F. Margravé, Michael P. Lamoureux
2018· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Sneak Previews
Gérard C. Herman
2003· article· en· The Leading Edge· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Making sense of all that AVO stuff!
Brian Russell
2012· article· en· ASEG Extended Abstracts· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Quantitative 4D warping inversion
A. Grandi, Séverine Wauquier, Hannah Cummiing, Christian Deplanté, C. Hubans
2009· article· en· International Petroleum Technology Conference· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Reviews
R. E. Sheriff, David C. Bartel, Larry Lines, Fernando Silva Neves, Fouad Michael
2001· article· en· The Leading Edge· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Reviews
Aldo Vesnaver, William R. Green, Fouad Michael, Christopher Kendall
2000· article· en· The Leading Edge· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About