MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Scholarly Publishing
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

723 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
723 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 7 of 15

Labels cover 71 of 723 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 723 of 723 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+research_integritygpt · metaresearch+bibliometrics+scholarly_communication+research_integritymodels split
Hidden Dangers: COVID-19-Based Research in Predatory Journals
Simon Linacre, Sneha K. Rhode, Kathleen Berryman
2024· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Will Peer Review Still Function and How?
Sheri Spaine Long
2010· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Why Books Still Matter
JOHN DONATICH
2009· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Price of University Press Books, 1989-2000
Albert N. Greco, Walter F. O'Connor, Sharon P. Smith, Robert M. Wharton
2003· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
3
citations
venueno affgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationmodels split
What Happens When the Author Does Not Provide an Abstract
Joseph S. Fulda
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Taking Clio's Pulse …
Anne L. Buchanan, Jean‐Pierre V. M. Hérubel
2010· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars?
Michael C. Jensen
2007· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
A Compilation of Short Takes on Working from Home
Bryan Birchmeier, Erika Dyck, Kathie Porta Baker, Sarah Bühler, Olivier Lebert
2020· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Beyond Google: What Next for Publishing?
Kate Wittenberg
2006· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Ethics of Scholarly Book Reviewing
Steven E. Gump
2024· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels agree
Assessing the Demand for Scholarly Publishing in South Africa
Elizabeth le Roux, Francis Galloway
2008· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Indexing: A Users' Perspective
David Henige
2002· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · bibliometrics+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Judging Journal Prices: A Cost Index for Academic Journals
Colin Day
2010· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
When We Began: The Origins of <i>JSP</i>
Ian Montagnes
2019· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Review Boards for Scientific Publishing
Nathan Hagen
2018· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Modern Book Publishing: Web Sites for the Trade
John Rodzvilla
2014· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Adventures in Reprint Rights
Maggie Hivnor
2001· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels agree
The Gutenberg Syndrome: An Illusion of International Research
Amadio Arboleda
2001· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A Tax on Productivity?
Stephen K. Donovan
2009· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Editing a Specialized Encyclopedia
Benjamin R Beede
2001· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About