MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,130 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,130 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 8 of 43

Labels cover 1 of 2,130 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,130 of 2,130 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Legal universalism: Persistent objections
Kevin E. Davis
2010· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
8
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Rule of Law as Liberal Justice
T. R. S. Allan
2006· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
8
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts
Benjamin Alarie, Andrew Green
2017· book· en· Oxford University Press eBooks· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
7
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Judgments of the Supreme Court of Canada
Long Ling
2016· article· en· Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Deference on Questions of Law
Paul Daly
2011· article· en· Modern Law Review· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Advisors to Elites
Sara C. Benesh, David Armstrong, Zachary Wallander
2020· article· en· Journal of Law and Courts· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
The Truth About Canadian Judicial Activism
Sanjeev Anand
2011· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · sts
6
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The law of the Canadian constitution
Cheri Reames
2016· article· en· Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · sts
6
citations
affaboutno abstractunlabeled
Social Rights in Canada
Patrick Macklem
2006· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations
venueno affunlabeled
JUDICIAL POLITICS IN AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES
R. Balasubramaniam
2009· article· en· University of Toronto Law Journal· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
6
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About