MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

7,589 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
7,589 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 96 of 152

Labels cover 6 of 7,589 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 7,589 of 7,589 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
The Gravitational Lens CFRS 03.1077
2002· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
afffundunlabeled
Probing the CGM of low-redshift dwarf galaxies using FIRE simulations
Fei Li, Mubdi Rahman, Norman Murray, Zachary Hafen, Claude‐André Faucher‐Giguère, Jonathan Stern +4 more
2020· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Modelling of the complex CASSOWARY/SLUGS gravitational lenses
Brendon J. Brewer, Geraint F. Lewis, Vasily Belokurov, M. J. Irwin, Terry Bridges, N. W. Evans
2011· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
afffundunlabeled
HectoMAP: The Complete Redshift Survey (Data Release 2)
Jubee Sohn, Margaret J. Geller, Ho Seong Hwang, Daniel G. Fabricant, Yousuke Utsumi, Ivana Damjanov
2023· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Properties of Extremely Red Objects in an Overdense Region
Marcin Sawicki, M. A. Stevenson, L. Felipe Barrientos, Brett Gladman, G. Mallén-Ornelas, Sidney van den Bergh
2005· article· en· The Astrophysical Journal· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About