MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

552 results · 1 filter active ·
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
552 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 12

Labels cover 2 of 552 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 552 of 552 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affno abstractunlabeled
A rational model of function learning
2015· review· en· Psychonomic Bulletin & Review· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
112
citations
affunlabeled
The p-value fallacy and how to avoid it.
2003· article· en· Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
88
citations
affunlabeled
Review spotlight
2011· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
83
citations
affunlabeled
KEA
2004· book-chapter· en· IGI Global eBooks· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
73
citations
affunlabeled
Story Forest
2020· article· en· ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · open_scienceconsensus · none
60
citations
affunlabeled
The scientific study of literature
2011· article· en· Scientific Study of Literature· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · sts+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
46
citations
affaboutunlabeled
When experts agree
2001· article· en· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About