MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,557 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,557 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 32

Labels cover 3 of 1,557 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,557 of 1,557 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The Crime Drop and the Security Hypothesis
Graham Farrell, Andromachi Tseloni, Jen Mailley, Nick Tilley
2011· article· en· Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
293
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Crime Analysis Through Machine Learning
Su Hong Kim, Param Joshi, Parminder Singh Kalsi, Pooya Taheri
2018· article· en· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
167
citations
affunlabeled
Crime Pattern Theory
Paul Brantingham, Patricia L. Brantingham
2021· reference-entry· en· Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
147
citations
affunlabeled
Slaughterhouses and Increased Crime Rates
Amy Fitzgerald, Linda Kalof, Thomas Dietz
2009· article· en· Organization & Environment· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
134
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Uncleared Homicides
Wendy C. Regoeczi, Leslie W. Kennedy, Robert A. Silverman
2000· article· en· Homicide Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
126
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
WHAT ACCOUNTS FOR THE DECLINE IN CRIME?*
Ayşe İmrohoroğlu, Antonio Merlo, Peter Rupert
2004· article· en· International Economic Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
124
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Study of Policing
Peter K. Manning
2005· article· en· Police Quarterly· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
122
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Victimology: Past, Present and Future
Ezzat A. Fattah
2002· article· en· Criminologie· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
120
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About