MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

220 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
220 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 5

Labels cover 6 of 220 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 220 of 220 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Rigour and grounded theory research
Rosalina F. Chiovitti, Niva Piran
2003· article· en· Journal of Advanced Nursing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
524
citations
affunlabeled
Enhancing Rigor in Qualitative Description
Jill Milne, Kathleen Oberle
2005· review· en· Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
438
citations
affunlabeled
What is a case study?
Roberta Heale, Alison Twycross
2017· editorial· en· Evidence-Based Nursing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
295
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Good qualitative research
Hossein Nassaji
2020· article· en· Language Teaching Research· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
254
citations
affunlabeled
Sample size and grounded theory
S. Thomson
2011· article· en· SSRN Electronic Journal· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
139
citations
affunlabeled
The Qualitative Doctoral Dissertation Proposal
Brent Kilbourn
2006· article· en· Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
105
citations
afffundunlabeled
Critical Approach to Reflexivity in Grounded Theory
Stephen J. Gentles, Susan M. Jack, David Nicholas, K. Ann McKibbon
2014· article· en· The Qualitative Report· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
84
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About