MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
ACM Transactions on Storage
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

19 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20052024
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
19 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 0 of 19 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 19 of 19 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
A study of practical deduplication
Dutch T. Meyer, William J. Bolosky
2012· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
472
citations
affunlabeled
An analysis of data corruption in the storage stack
Lakshmi N. Bairavasundaram, Andrea C. Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H. Arpaci-Dusseau, Garth R. Goodson, Bianca Schroeder
2008· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
284
citations
affunlabeled
RAIDShield
Ao Ma, Rachel Traylor, Fred Douglis, Mark Chamness, Guanlin Lu, Darren Sawyer +2 more
2015· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
74
citations
affunlabeled
Write Skew and Zipf Distribution
Yue Yang, Jianwen Zhu
2016· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
56
citations
affunlabeled
Recon
Daniel Fryer, Kuei Sun, Rahat Mahmood, Tinghao Cheng, Shaun Benjamin, Ashvin Goel +1 more
2012· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
afffundunlabeled
Checking the Integrity of Transactional Mechanisms
Daniel Fryer, Mike Qin, Jack Sun, Kah Wai Lee, Angela Demke Brown, Ashvin Goel
2014· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
10
citations
affunlabeled
Reliability of SSDs in Enterprise Storage Systems
Stathis Maneas, Kaveh Mahdaviani, Tim Emami, Bianca Schroeder
2021· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
9
citations
afffundunlabeled
CosaFS
Lingfang Zeng, Zehao Zhang, Yang Wang, Dan Feng, Kenneth B. Kent
2017· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Holographic Storage for the Cloud: advances and challenges
Nathanaël Cheriere, Jiaqi Chu, Grace Brennan, Pashmina Cameron, Pedro F. da Costa, Jannes Gladrow +16 more
2024· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
7
citations
affunlabeled
Treating the Storage Stack Like a Network
Ioan Stefanovici, Bianca Schroeder, Greg O’Shea, Eno Thereska
2017· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affunlabeled
Spiffy
Kuei Sun, Daniel Fryer, Russell Wang, Sagar Patel, Joseph Chu, Matthew Lakier +2 more
2020· article· en· ACM Transactions on Storage· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About