MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Learned Publishing
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

49 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
49 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 7 of 49 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 49 of 49 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Data, disciplines, and scholarly publishing
Christine L. Borgman
2007· article· en· Learned Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
60
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Sci‐Hub: The new and ultimate disruptor? View from the front
David Nicholas, Chérifa Boukacem‐Zeghmouri, Jie Xu, Eti Herman, David Clark, Abdullah Abrizah +2 more
2018· article· en· Learned Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
Predecessors of preprint servers
J. E. Till
2001· article· en· Learned Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communication+open_scienceconsensus · none
36
citations
affgemma · metaresearch+research_integritygpt · research_integrity+scholarly_communicationmodels split
Human‐ and <scp>AI</scp>‐based authorship: Principles and ethics
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Panagiotis Tsigaris
2023· article· en· Learned Publishing· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
32
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Republication of conference papers in journals?
Yuehong Zhang, Xiaoyan Jia
2013· article· en· Learned Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
28
citations
affunlabeled
Evaluating equity in scholarly publishing
Simone Taylor, Susan Spilka, Kristen Monahan, Isabel Mulhern, Jeri Wachter
2020· article· en· Learned Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+open_scienceconsensus · none
12
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reviews
Dee Wood
2001· article· en· Learned Publishing
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
6
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Citation rules through the eyes of biomedical journal editors
Jiří Kratochvíl, Helga Abrahámová, Marta Fialová, Martina Stodůlková
2021· article· en· Learned Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
3
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The University Press Redux: Introduction
Anthony Cond, Samantha J. Rayner
2016· article· en· Learned Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Publishing: a market‐led approach
Mike Grace
2001· article· en· Learned Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Book Reviews
Janet Halsall, Pippa Smart, Anthony Watkinson
2004· article· en· Learned Publishing· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Book Reviews
Norm HIRSCHY
2012· article· en· Learned Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About