MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Research Ethics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

47 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20082025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
47 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 1

Labels cover 2 of 47 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 47 of 47 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affgemma · research_integritygpt · no categorymodels split
Are research ethics guidelines culturally competent?
Ben Gray, Jo Hilder, Lindsay Macdonald, Rachel Tester, Anthony Dowell, Maria Stubbe
2016· article· en· Research Ethics· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
22
citations
afffundaboutunlabeled
A reflection on research ethics and citizen science
Kathleen Oberle, Stacey Page, Fintan Stanley, Aaron A. Goodarzi
2019· article· en· Research Ethics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
19
citations
affunlabeled
The ethics of metaphor as a research tool
Kiran Pohar Manhas, Kathleen Oberle
2015· article· en· Research Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
13
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Exploring ethical frontiers of visual methods
Catherine Howell, Susan Cox, Sarah Drew, Marilys Guillemin, Deborah Warr, Jenny Waycott
2014· article· en· Research Ethics· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · metaresearch
11
citations
afffundaboutgemma · research_integritygpt · metaresearchmodels split
Pragmatic clinical trials and the consent process
Blake Murdoch, Timothy Caulfield
2017· article· en· Research Ethics· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
8
citations
affunlabeled
Ethics review and conversation analysis
Jeffrey P. Aguinaldo
2022· article· en· Research Ethics· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearch+research_integrityconsensus · none
5
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About